Error parsing XSLT file: \xslt\FacebookOpenGraph.xslt Damian James' Blog: 30 June 2008
Cookies on Businesscar

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on the Business Car website. However, if you would like to, you can change your cookies at any time

BusinessCar magazine website email Awards mobile

The start point for the best source of fleet information

Damian James' Blog: 30 June 2008

Date: 30 June 2008

Damian James

According to the BBC it has now been suggested that for the proposed Manchester congestion charge to get the go ahead it will need to be approved at a referendum

Congestion charge Manchester

According to the BBC it has now been suggested that for the proposed Manchester congestion charge to get the go ahead it will need to be approved at a referendum.

Due to the extent of the area the proposed charge will cover it involves 10 different local authorities. As is usual some of these bodies support the charge and some don't. It seems the fairest way forward then is to have a general referendum on the issue assuming everyone agrees to abide by the result.

If this happens then the key is the question that is asked. With my tongue firmly in my cheek perhaps I can make some suggestions which would give you differing answers:

  • Would you want to pay when you drive into the Greater Manchester area? - No
  • Would you like to see investment into Greater Manchester's public transport? - Yes
  • Would you like to reduce your car journey time due to less congestion? - Yes

If there is to be a referendum, based on past experience, it will be extremely unlikely that the charge will go ahead meaning the area could loose out on public transport improvements promised as a result of congestion charging revenue.

In 2005 Edinburgh undertook a similar referendum and 74% of voters rejected the scheme sending out a very clear message. If these schemes are ever likely to get public backing then there needs to be a clearer package of benefits available to drivers rather than someone just telling them they will have to pay more to use their car.



Share


Subscribe