Error parsing XSLT file: \xslt\FacebookOpenGraph.xslt Roddy Graham's Blog: 18 July 2008
Cookies on Businesscar

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on the Business Car website. However, if you would like to, you can change your cookies at any time

BusinessCar magazine website email Awards mobile

The start point for the best source of fleet information

Roddy Graham's Blog: 18 July 2008

Date: 18 July 2008

Roddy Graham is chairman of the ICFM and commercial director of Leasedrive Velo

So Swindon Borough Council has declared what we all know to be true. Speed cameras are a revenue generator for the Treasury!

Until the summer of last year, all councils received a percentage of takings but since then everything goes to central Government, who then provides local councils with a road safety grant to hopefully erect more revenue generating machines.

Apparently, official figures indicate an average 100 lives are saved each year by around 6000 speed cameras up and down the country. Where speed cameras have done their job, they are sometimes put out of commission by having a plastic bag put over their cameras, much as with parking meters.

Swindon Borough Council, a Tory-led council, is bridling against the £400,000 cost per annum of installing and maintaining these unpopular devices. It feels the money could be best spent elsewhere such as on electronic speed advisory signs (average cost £5000, known to reduce speed by an average two to three miles per hour) and traffic calming measures.

In certain positions, speed cameras are a strong deterrent and an undoubted saver of lives. In other spots, they are a clear money-spinner.

I believe better road safety guidelines as to when and where they are used should be drawn up, as it is clear from public opinion that their use and positioning is clearly highly controversial. At known black spots, and outside schools, they should be a 'must' but elsewhere electronic speed advisory signs and the like could be more effective in getting drivers to lower and control their speed. Electronic signs are almost a form of real-time, 'name and shame' although I accept they do not stop everyone.

Probably the most effective current deterrent are the average speed cameras deployed at motorway roadworks. These definitely command the attention of motorists and could be selectively installed on major roads in and out of towns.

Official statistics show that the percentage of drivers who regularly break the 30mph speed limit has been lowered from 75% to 49%. Obviously, there is a long way to go but with road deaths down below 3000 per annum for the first time in over 80 years, as a country we are moving in the right direction.



Share


Subscribe