Error parsing XSLT file: \xslt\FacebookOpenGraph.xslt Our Fleet Test Drive Review: Volvo XC60 11th Report
Cookies on Businesscar

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on the Business Car website. However, if you would like to, you can change your cookies at any time

BusinessCar magazine website email Awards mobile

The start point for the best source of fleet information

Our Fleet Test Drive Review: Volvo XC60 11th Report

Date: 06 October 2009   |   Author: Tristan Young

Two XC60s
Category: Small 4x4
P11D price: £28,785
Key rival: Audi Q5

Fuel-saving technology is moving at such a pace that our 183PS D5-engined Volvo XC60 has already been superseded by a new D5 producing 204PS.

However, the closest match to the outgoing model is the new 175PS 2.4D, which is why when we decided to compare old with new we swapped our long-termer for a 2.4D in eco Driv-e form for three weeks.

It's the most fleet-friendly model, too, emitting 159g/km CO2 and, according to official figures, is 27% better for consumption: the old 4x4 D5 achieves 37.7mpg (our average was 32.6mpg) while the new front-drive version 2.4D manages 47.1mpg (our average was 42.0mpg). However, with a little effort put into eco-driving (e.g. turning off the aircon and only accelerating gently) we saw some much higher figures, more than 50.0mpg, on one run from London to Newcastle - brilliant for an off-roader. The new engine is much more responsive, too, making the new Driv-e easier to drive economically and giving the car a feeling of having more power. The only downside is that if you do go off-road, or it snows, you've only got front drive - a small price to pay in our book.

Volvo XC60 2.4D SE Lux manual
Claimed combined
Our average
Forecast CPM54.1p
Actual CPM53.6p
P11D price£29,290
CO2 (tax) 159g/km (22%)
Insurancegroup 13
Engine size/power2400cc/175PS
Why we’re running itTo see what improvement
the Driv-e tech offers
PositiveFuel consumption, more
responsive engine
NegativeNot 4x4 any more,
satnav routing