Error parsing XSLT file: \xslt\FacebookOpenGraph.xslt Citroen C5 Tourer: Test Drive (continued)
Cookies on Businesscar

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on the Business Car website. However, if you would like to, you can change your cookies at any time

BusinessCar magazine website email Awards mobile

The start point for the best source of fleet information

Citroen C5 Tourer: Test Drive (continued)

Date: 26 June 2008   |   Author:

Citroen C5 estate
Category: Upper medium
P11D price: £19,420
Key rival: Ford Mondeo estate

It's a shame because the new C5 is a world away from its underwhelming but comfortable predecessor. That's especially evident on the inside, where the step up in cockpit materials is spectacular. The dash is still a bit cluttered, though, with too many buttons and controls compared with more ergonomically sound rivals. The fixed-hub steering wheel, in which the central section stays static while the outer wheel moves, also fails to find favour with all drivers.

Citroen C5 Tourer_Page 29.gif

The 2.0 HDi driven here should be the most popular fleet model, and while it's good without excelling, and the C5 is an improved vehicle in terms of driving quality, the engine does though put the C5 one BIK band above its rivals in the 23% segment.

However, predicted residual values from Emmox Carcost puts the C5 Tourer at 35.9% retained value after three years and 60,000 miles, compared with 30.5% for the Mondeo and 31.2% for the Laguna. Only the Passat's more premium brand status beats it with a 37.2% RV.

Equipment on the mid-spec VTR+ tested here is decent, too, with alloys, auto lights and wipers, tinted rear windows, cruise control and climate control all standard. Move up to the Exclusive trim and rear parking sensors, an electric tailgate and tyre pressure sensors are among the features added to the list.

The new C5 Touring is a more likeable, impressive and cost-effective car than its replacement - it's just a shame that there's a practicality down-side with the reduced load space.

BACK...



Share


Subscribe